[PlanetCCRMA] Building Alsa RPMs...

[Mark Knecht]

Ok, I couldn't even begin to tell you today what the difference is. We'll
save that for later.

apt-get install kernel-source

actually comes back and tells me to choose 1 of 6 options. What's
interesting is that there are really just 3 listed, but each listed twice.
Is this correct? Or possibly are there actually 386 and 686 versions and the
message isn't right?

Or maybe something else is going on?

I chose kernel-source#2.4.19-1.ll@386

> -----Original Message-----
> From: planetccrma-admin@ccrma.Stanford.EDU
> [mailto:planetccrma-admin@ccrma.Stanford.EDU]On Behalf Of Fernando Pablo
> Lopez-Lezcano
> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 10:50 AM
> To: Mark Knecht
> Cc: PlanetCCRMA
> Subject: Re: [PlanetCCRMA] Building Alsa RPMs...
>
>
> > When I attempt Step 3 it fails and tells me that I must install the full
> > source code for the kernel.
>
> apt-get install kernel-source
> :-)
>
> > To get past this I tried using
> >
> > http://www-ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/recompilekernel.html
> >
> > I downloaded using the link at the top, and then installed it using
> >
> > rpm -Uvh kernel-2.4.19-1.ll.src.rpm
>
> This is the source rpm that is used to rebuild the kernel, not the built
> "binary" source rpm. I know, it is confusing.
>
> -- Fernando
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>
>