[PlanetCCRMA] Building Alsa RPMs...

[Mark Knecht]

Fernando,
   On the following page

http://www-ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/recompilealsa.html

is the order of building the 4 pieces critical?

Or should I be able to build all the RPMs first, and then later install them
on a different machine using a single command:

RPM -Uvh alsa-driver*0.9.0-44.i386.rpm alsa-lib-0.9.0-44.i386.rpm
alsa-utils-0.9.0-44.i386.rpm alsa-tools-0.9.0-44.i386.rpm

Also, can this process be done on a machine that already has 0.9.0-44
installed on it? I'm seeing some errors at the rpm -bb
../RPMS/i386/alsa-tools-0.9.0-44.i386.rpm step and am wondering why.
(Unresolved symbols again, like the rpm -q problem we had yesterday.)

I think that maybe I need to do some sort of rpm -e --nodeps step here in
preparation for doing this stuff? Not sure, but even this step

rpm -Uvh ../RPMS/i386/alsa-lib-0.9.0-44.i386.rpm

shows package conflicts.

Thanks much,
Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: planetccrma-admin@ccrma.Stanford.EDU
> [mailto:planetccrma-admin@ccrma.Stanford.EDU]On Behalf Of Fernando Pablo
> Lopez-Lezcano
> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:45 AM
> To: Mark Knecht
> Cc: PlanetCCRMA
> Subject: RE: [PlanetCCRMA] Building Alsa RPMs...
>
>
> > actually comes back and tells me to choose 1 of 6 options. What's
> > interesting is that there are really just 3 listed, but each
> listed twice.
> > Is this correct? Or possibly are there actually 386 and 686
> versions and the
> > message isn't right?
> >
> > Or maybe something else is going on?
> >
> > I chose kernel-source#2.4.19-1.ll@386
>
> That one is fine.
> -- Fernando
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>
>