[PlanetCCRMA] more disk performance problems

[Mark Knecht]

Sounds to me like one of the (many) changes between 2.6.12 and 2.6.13
possibly got left out of the 2.6.13 FC4 build.

If you go back and run the 2.6.12 FC4 kernel can you see modules
loaded that are not loaded under 2.6.13? OR maybe it's just built-0in
stuff being different. Who's chipset is in the machine? Post back the
results from lspci  if you get a chance.

- Mark

On 9/20/05, jfm3 <jfm3@ouroboros-complex.org> wrote:
> This is indeed a SATA drive.
> 
> What's more frusterating is  that I have decent disk performance with
> the stock 2.6.12 FC4 kernel, but not with the Planet 2.6.13 FC4 kernel.
> 
> I've started analyzing patches, but that will take me a while.
> 
> The motherboard is whatever is within this Dell Precision M70 laptop.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 09:21 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On 9/20/05, jfm3 <jfm3@ouroboros-complex.org> wrote:
> > > I upgraded to planetedge and the 2.6.13 kernel for FC4.
> > >
> > > Now, instead of seeing my disk as sda, it comes up as hda. I'm not
> > > really sure what this means.
> >
> > Is this a SATA drive? If so I think that the change from sda to hda is
> > part of using libata now in newer kernels instead of more individual
> > SATA drivers as before.
> >
> > DMA is clearly not working for you. What motherboard is this?
> >
> > - Mark
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> > PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
> > http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
> 
>