On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 21:41 -0500, linuxmedia4@netscape.net wrote: > (I didn't know if I should start a new thread) > > It was suggested that "rtirq script was 'not doing the right thing' on > later kernels". Would this, by any chance, be the situation for > 2.6.16-1.2080.16.rrt.rhfc5.ccrma? Nope, that one is "old" :-) -- Fernando