[PlanetCCRMA] librubberband.so

[S Fielding]

Len wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----
>   
>> From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
>> To: Jeff Sandys <sandysj at juno.com>
>> Cc: planetccrma at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
>> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 2:31:21 AM
>> Subject: Re: [PlanetCCRMA] librubberband.so
>>
>> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 22:26 +0000, Jeff Sandys wrote:
>>     
>>> When I first installed CCRMA in Fedora 8, I had a problem getting 
>>>       
>> sonic-visualizer 
>>     
>>> running, it complained about a missing librubberband.so file.  So I added it 
>>> from find-rpm and sonic-visualizer worked.
>>>
>>> Now I am installing updates, and sooperlooper fails to update, complaining 
>>> about missing dependency, librubberband.so.1 required.
>>>
>>> Any hint on how to fix this?
>>>       
>> Could you post the complete error message you get? Dependencies should
>> be fine but somehow are broken in your case (is this on fc8 still?)...
>>
>> -- Fernando
>>
>>     
>
> This is exactly the same issue I had a week ago, when I posted the message below to the list:
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>   
>> From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
>> To: Len <lenb_99 at yahoo.com>
>> Cc: planetccrma at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 3:33:45 AM
>> Subject: Re: [PlanetCCRMA] Error in dependency resolution
>>
>> On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 20:00 -0700, Len wrote:
>>     
>>> When I tried applying the most recent ccrma updates, one (rubberband) 
>>> complained about sooperlooper needing librubberband.so.1()(64bit).  So, 
>>> I removed sooperlooper so that I could apply all updates.  I tried 
>>> re-installing sooperlooper, but I still get:
>>>
>>> 22:28:42 : Error in Dependency Resolution
>>> 22:28:42 : Missing Dependency: librubberband.so.1()(64bit) is needed 
>>> by package sooperlooper
>>>
>>> Does sooperlooper need an older version of librubberband?  Am I
>>> just out of luck until the next release of sooperlooper, or can I 
>>> somehow downgrade rubberband?
>>>       
>> Which version of the Fedora?? It will save me time to know that!
>> -- Fernando
>>
>>
>> So sorry.  I'm running F8 on x86_64.
>>
>> Len
>>     
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
>
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>   
There is a version of sooperlooper on fedora-updates which is different 
from  the version on ccrma. The best thing to do is yum remove 
sooperlooper and then reinstall - "yum --disablerepo=updates install 
sooperlooper". That fixed it for me.

Simon