[PlanetCCRMA] Broken dependency with planetccrma-core on Fedora 21?

Nils Tonnätt nils.tonnaett at gmx.net
Fri Apr 3 16:24:47 PDT 2015


Sorry, I thought installation works but yum installed an old version of 
planetccrma-core. That's weird behaviour. Why isn't it choosing the most 
recent version? When I do yum upgrade it tries to install version 2015.3.22.

--Nils


Am 03.04.2015 um 22:36 schrieb Fernando Lopez-Lezcano:
> On 04/01/2015 02:38 AM, Nils Tonnätt wrote:
>> After removing kernel-rt and planetccrma-core and reinstall kernel-rt
>> the new kernel gets installed. But planetccrma-core has a dependency
>> problem.
>>
>> Fehler: Paket: planetccrma-core-2015.03.22-1.fc21.ccrma.x86_64 
>> (planetcore)
>>               Benötigt: kernel-rt-3.18.9-201.rt5.1.fc21.ccrma
>>
>> Maybe the architecture is missing?
>
> I tried naming the dependency differently and it looks the new 
> packages work fine, let me know...
> -- Fernando
>
>
>> Am 31.03.2015 um 20:00 schrieb Fernando Lopez-Lezcano:
>>> On 03/31/2015 08:34 AM, Michael J. Wilson wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> When updating my system today I observed the following dependency 
>>>> issue:
>>>>
>>>> Error: Package: planetccrma-core-2015.03.22-1.fc21.ccrma.x86_64 
>>>> (planetcore)
>>>>               Requires: kernel-rt-3.18.9-201.rt5.1.fc21.ccrma
>>> Which is weird because that package exists in the repository.
>>>
>>>> I removed the planetccrma-core package and updated again, and
>>>> kernel-rt-core was installed.  Maybe package renaming caused the 
>>>> issue?
>>>>     Is planetccrma-core not the recommended way to pull in 
>>>> dependencies
>>>> anymore?
>>> Should be...
>>>
>>>> In any event, I'm leaving planetccrma-core uninstalled for now.
>>> If you remove the old planetccrma-core and reinstall it it should
>>> install all dependencies and be fine afterwards. I'm still trying to
>>> figure out why this is happening (the packaging for the kernel in fc21
>>> changed and so did the dependencies, I thought I had fixed this).
>>>
>>> Anyway, I've been running 3.18*rt* for a bit and seems solid so far 
>>> (and
>>> probably as I type this computers start crashing left and right to
>>> disprove it :-)
>>>
>>> Thanks for the report!
>>> -- Fernando
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>>> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
>>> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
>> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>>
>



More information about the PlanetCCRMA mailing list