<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Rui Nuno Capela <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rncbc@rncbc.org" target="_blank">rncbc@rncbc.org</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
thanks for your support Niels.<br>
<br>
first hand news are qtractor svn trunk is pretty stable as is now<br>
(qtractor 0.4.5.1568 aka svn r1565)<br></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
you can expect an upstream 0.4.6 release before the end of the month, i<br>
hope ;)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That's great news and thanks for letting us know of the timeframe. Seems best to just wait a bit...</div><div><br></div><div>In the meantime, if anybody wants the stable version I built from Simon Lewis' SRPM </div>
<div><a href="http://nielsmayer.com/qtractor-0.4.5svn1517-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm" target="_blank">http://nielsmayer.com/qtractor-0.4.5svn1517-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm</a></div><div><br></div><div>I can fully understand Orcan's position on this; at the same time I think qtractor might need some special priority because it's the first "pro" level integrated audio/midi/plugin DAW on Linux that won't send people running back to their Logic's , Pro-Tools and Sonar. Given that such an app is the crucial missing piece of the Linux DAW puzzle, we should give it extra care in testing/debugging and making sure this future key Fedora music tool is working & stable.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Considering there's a few fedora users building their own qtractors off svn, it would be good to coordinate Rui's 0.4.6 release by announcing a stable "release candidate" that we can try out on whatever platforms and Fedora releases we have available (only-x86_64 F12 here). That way there won't need to be any post-0.4.6 patches for Fedora and Orcan can have a clean release to submit to rpmfusion.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Are bugs against the rpmfusion qtractor supposed to be reported via <a href="https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/</a> ? (Too bad our rpmfusion coredumps can't get automatically reported via abrtd back to <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/</a> which is better-customized and a tad more "inviting", and also has a valid SSL certificate :-) ).</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thanks!</div><div><br></div><div>-- Niels</div><div><a href="http://nielsmayer.com" target="_blank">http://nielsmayer.com</a></div>
</div>