It's ok now without the symlinks!<div><br><div>(In more detail, I removed the symlinks, then it would hang on launch, then I did a yum update and reboot for good measure, and now all seems to be working). I'll send the output file in my next email in case there is anything you want to look for. - Thanks - jos</div>
<div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Orcan Ogetbil <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:oget.fedora@gmail.com">oget.fedora@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Julius Smith wrote:<br>
> At 07:13 PM 10/30/2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:<br>
</div><div class="im">>> We have the following patch in the Fedora 12 package since February<br>
>> 2010 (i.e. since rosegarden10 was released).<br>
>> <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2e2sqk9" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/2e2sqk9</a><br>
>> This fixes the dssi and ladspa plugin paths.<br>
><br>
</div><div class="im">> Hmmm, my system should be up to date:<br>
><br>
> uname -a<br>
><br>
> Linux myhost 2.6.32.21-168.fc12.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Sep 15 16:12:07 UTC 2010<br>
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux<br>
><br>
> Shouldn't the patch come in with my Fedora updates?<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>It should. This is strange. I would like to see the output when you<br>
start your rosegarden. With the symlinks removed and the environmental<br>
variables DSSI_PATH and LADSPA_PATH unset, could you run this command<br>
rosegarden 2> rosegarden.output 1>&2<br>
and send me the rosegarden.output file this produces?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Orcan<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>"Anybody who knows all about nothing knows everything" -- Leonard Susskind<br>
</div></div>