[Stk] Register keyword is deprecated

[Gary Scavone]

No problem.  That is another left-over from the days when computers were much slower and we were really worried about algorithm efficiency.

—gary

On Apr 5, 2014, at 4:07 PM, Perry Cook <prc at cs.princeton.edu> wrote:

> I'm all for removing it in all cases.  Just one throw of any
> level of -O# optimization gives the compiler the right to
> make these decisions for us anyway.  The variety of 
> Processor architectures with registers numbering from 
> 2 to dozens means we'll generally not make the best 
> choices, but the compilers know what to do better than
> we.
> 
> Prc
> 
> Sent from my iPad :-)
> 
>> On Apr 5, 2014, at 1:00 PM, Ariel Elkin <arielelkin at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hey all,
>> 
>> Several Stk classes such as BeeThree, FMVoices, HevyMetl, as well as Stk.cpp make use of the “register” storage class specifier. 
>> 
>> According to the latest C++ standard,  “the use of the register keyword as a storage-class-specifier (7.1.1) is deprecated” 
>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3797.pdf
>> page 1242
>> 
>> Compilers such as LLVM v5.1 have picked up on this and are starting to complain heavily...
>> 
>> So anyone has an objection to getting rid of "register”? 
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Ariel
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Stk mailing list
>> Stk at ccrma.stanford.edu
>> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/stk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Stk mailing list
> Stk at ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/stk