[PlanetCCRMA] Re: Apt-get repositories compatibility

[David Fraser]

Axel Thimm wrote:

>On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 10:22:58PM +0100, Mr.Freeze wrote:
>  
>
>>I'm up to have a go for a Fedora Core update, but before that I'd like to
>>improve my way of installing: by downloading most packages!
>>    
>>
>
>Well, that's a noble goal, but sometimes questionable ;)
>
>I am doing so with ATrpms' setup. It enables access to PlanetCCRMA, as
>well as freshrpms, newrpms, atrpms itself and half a dozen other repos
>(depending of those repos supporting the distribution you wish to
>use).
>
>  
>
>>The bottom line is: what are the Planet CCRMA compliant / complementary
>>repositories?
>>    
>>
>
>I know I will keep ATrpms compatible to PlanetCCRMA, and there is no
>reason for the other repos not to do so. Should you detect any anomaly
>between two repos, please notify the pair or repo maintainers to fix it.
>
>Speaking of which: Fernando and I would like to consolidate the
>kernel efforts of PlanetCCRMA and ATrpms and could use a helping hand :)
>
>I am quite sure the different added patchsets in PlanetCCRMA/ATrpms
>are non-conflicting and complement each other nicely (CCRMA touches
>capabilities and ll/preemt, ATrpms filesystems and v4l2). The main
>work would be to get the CCRMA patches appliable onto a Red Hat
>kernel (e.g. 2.4.22-1.2135.nptl). Any takers? :) :) :)
>
>Hope you had a nice time until now and enjoy preparation for embarking
>into the new year! :)
>  
>
Sounds interesting. Is there a URL for ATrpms?

Thanks
David