[PlanetCCRMA] Re: stk-4.1.1?

[Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano]

> Many of us have made these "de-linting" changes independently already, so 
> nobody should need to figure them out afresh.  I would be happy to post 
> mine for download somewhere (but be prepared for a few non-standard 
> alterations --- all hopefully backward compatible).

Well, how about a new release of stk when said problems are fixed? Are
the things you fixed the same as the fixes in the patch? Otherwise the
world keeps reinventing the wheel :-)

-- Fernando

> I have to say I was amazed that C++ abandoned backward compatibility itself.
> 
> Julius
> 
> At 05:15 PM 3/2/2004, you wrote:
> > > thanks, jake. pardon my stupidity, but i'm guessing now that i have
> > > to download the source files and apply to patch to...which file..?
> >
> >I'll try to take a look at this latter today, as you will see in a post
> >coming up soon, I've been a little busy :-)
> >
> >-- Fernando
> >
> > > >>  > is anyone using stk-4.1.1 in either planet ccrma rh or fedora core? i
> > > >>  > can't get it to make or much of anything (the package isn't fully
> > > >  > > made as is)..
> > > >>
> > > >>  I made some patches for this a while back.  It's from missing explicit
> > > >>  std:: in C++.  I had intended to send the patches to Fernando, but
> > > >>  forgot.  I can post them to the list for review in a few hours.
> > > >
> > > >Here you go.  If the attachment doesn't come through, it's at
> > > >http://jakemsr.com/stk-4.1.1.patch.gz.