[PlanetCCRMA] Re: apt broken after installing ATrpms?

[Axel Thimm]

--HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 11:16:55AM -0700, Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano wrot=
e:
> On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 10:21, Nathaniel Virgo wrote:
> > Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > >Argh....
> > >fftw3-3.0.1-2.fr is part of freshrpms...
> > >fftw-3.0.1-6.rhfc1.at is part of atrpms...
> > >
> > >What is it you have installed? ("rpm -q fftw", "rpm -q fft3")
> >
> > fftw-2.1.5-2.rhfc1.ccrma and fftw3-3.0.1-1.rhfc1.ccrma

Nando, has anthing changed on PlanetCCRMA's side wrt to fftw packaging
and usage (is any package using fftw >=3D 3?). On ATrpms' side there has
been no change for several months now, I wonder why suddenly there are
funny things going on (and Nathaniel is not the first to share the two
repos ;).

Perhaps another repo (like fftw3 from freshrpms) has shaken the old
stable setup. I am reviewing the fftw packages (doing so anyway, as
they don't build on FC3, or even worse, they build, but fail the
tests, looks like a gcc 3.4.2 thing).

> > >It is hard to know what is the root cause of the problem. That's becau=
se
> > >the dependency that is causing the problem is probably in a package th=
at
> > >is not currently installed in your machine. What is the complete output
> > >of the dist-upgrade? I mean, including the list of packages that are
> > >going to be upgraded, erased, etc?
> > >
> > >One way to go, I think, is work from that list and try a:
> > >  apt-get install xxx
> > >where xxx is each of the packages that is going to be upgraded, to see
> > >if you can isolate which one is causing the conflict.=20
> > > =20
> > >
> > I have pasted the full output of apt-get dist-upgrade below.  I noticed=
=20
> > that fftw and fftw3 are on the list of things to be upgraded, but=20
> > apt-get install fftw wants to remove ams
>=20
> Correct, "fftw" is newer on atrpms and is what I call fftw3, if you
> upgrade it ams should be removed because the older version of fftw (2)
> is no longer available.=20
>=20
> > and install fftw3 wants to=20
> > remove freqtweak jaaa jamin pvoc and swh-plugins so I didn't go through=
=20
> > with it.
>=20
> This I don't understand... more thought required...
>=20
> > I'm still stuck with the kde docs thing as well.  I didn't have=20
> > /usr/sbin/themer on my system so I installed it (via apt) but running i=
t=20
> > didn't fix the problem.
>=20
> I'm afraid you'll have to ask in the kde repository list, or browse
> their web site, supposedly what you need to do is explained somewhere
> there.=20
>=20
> > [root@sherka nev]# apt-get dist-upgrade
> > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > Calculating Upgrade... Done
> > The following packages will be upgraded
> >   ImageMagick arts cdrdao cdrecord docbook-utils fedora-logos fftw fftw=
3=20
> > flac
> >   fltk gstreamer gstreamer-plugins gtkam kde-i18n-British kdebase kdega=
mes
> >   kdelibs libmng libmng-devel libmusicbrainz mozilla mozilla-mail=20
> > mozilla-nspr
> >   mozilla-nss opensp qt redhat-artwork redhat-menus yum20
> > The following packages will be REPLACED:
> >   dvdrecord (by cdrecord)
> > The following NEW packages will be installed:
> >   Geramik Hermes OpenEXR QtPixmap fftw2-single freeglut gstreamer06
> >   gstreamer06-plugins hicolor-icon-theme jadetex jasper lame lcms libFL=
AC++2
> >   libFLAC++4 libFLAC4 libFLAC6 libOggFLAC++0 libOggFLAC1 libexif-gtk li=
bfame
> >   libfame0 libidn libmusicbrainz20 libosp4 libshout libsidplay libtheora
> >   libxvidcore4 mathml-fonts mjpegtools redhat-menus0 tetex-latex
> > The following packages have been kept back
> >   lm_sensors synaptic
> > 29 upgraded, 33 newly installed, 1 replaced, 0 removed and 2 not upgrad=
ed.
> > Need to get 0B/99.1MB of archives.
> > After unpacking 64.9MB of additional disk space will be used.
> > Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
> > Committing changes...
> > Preparing...                ###########################################=
=20
>=20
> What do you have in /etc/apt/preferences, if anything? Most probably you
> will have to use pinning to give priority to Planet CCRMA packages over
> the ones at atrpms...
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma

--=20
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

--HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBfpjBQBVS1GOamfERAi4sAKCLn0lU/ZI7E1+1iydNTLa3cbRwpwCfWZqj
O6ZpeOz96PcWGz3KrvPR30Y=
=fZSv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2--