[PlanetCCRMA] Audiuphile 192 and others

[Frode Petersen]

Mark Knecht wrote:
> On 11/15/05, Frode Petersen <fropeter@online.no> wrote:
> 
>>Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>>>I have a recollection that Jack does not yet handle 192KHz. Possibly
>>>that's been addressed by now but I'm sure it was true for a while.
>>>
>>>Check it out before you buy if that's important to you.
>>>
>>>Good luck,
>>>Mark
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>>>PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
>>>http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>>>
>>
>>Thanks for the warning! I'll check that out.
>>
>>Do you have an idea of how big an impact on sound quality the difference
>>in rate has? (Supposing I listen to the music on a high-end hifi system)
>>
>>Frode
> 
> 
> Well, the audio will probably have less of a positive impact on sound
> quality than the negative monetay impact your pocketbook would feel
> buying real 192KHz converters. (I.e. - with the M-Audio converters I
> wouldn't think it would be all that noticible, but I don't know...).
> Add to it that you'll be using 2x more disk space, and creating 2x
> more bandwidth issues in your machine, and you're getting a bit
> painful.
> 
> One other thought comes to mind. I'll bet you a beer the next time we
> meet in Saigon that almost none fo the LADSPA plugins really work at
> 192KHz either.
> 
> Good luck,
> Mark
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
> 
> 
> 

OK. 192KHz is dropped. Thanks for the help!

Frode