[PlanetCCRMA] New conflict with f9 update (and f8 too)

[Fernando Lopez-Lezcano]

On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 10:31 +0000, Simon W. Fielding wrote:
> Fernando,
> 
> What David says below is precisely what mine says also. Sorry for the
> delay in replying.

AFAICT sbcl 1.0.17 is the latest and the cm/clm/cmn packages from Planet
CCRMA already match that. What is happening is that you are still
pointing to some old repository and that may is probably Planet CCRMA
mirror, ahem. Sorry. You should disable the Planet CCRMA url for updates
(for now) and let the normal Fedora mirrors take care of updates. You
will see that you will _switch_ repositories to one with i386.newkey/
url and that's the one that will have the newer sbcl, etc packages (the
update will be a two stage process, first switch repositories and then
do the upgrade with the new one). 

-- Fernando


> > Hi Fernando
> > PUP says "Error resolving dependencies"
> > "Details
> > Missing dependency: sbcl = 1.0.17 is needed by package
> > slime-sbcl-2-0.12fc8.ccrma.i386 (installed)"
> > 
> > David
> > 
> > Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 12:49 +0000, Simon W. Fielding wrote:
> > >
> > >> Would it be possible to do the same for FC8? I would be very
> > grateful if
> > >> so.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Hmmm, I was not aware of a new sbcl for fc8? What is exactly yum
> > prints
> > > when you try an upgrade?
> > >
> > > -- Fernando
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Simon Fielding
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: planetccrma-bounces at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
> > >> [mailto:planetccrma-bounces at ccrma.Stanford.EDU] On Behalf Of
> > Fernando
> > >> Lopez-Lezcano
> > >> Sent: 27 November 2008 00:07
> > >> To: dawsonwu at rahul.net
> > >> Cc: planetccrma at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
> > >> Subject: Re: [PlanetCCRMA] New conflict with f9 update
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 14:52 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 14:32 -0800, Ken Dawson wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Fedora 9 just posted an update to sbcl.i386, and slime-sbcl
> > doesn't
> > >>>>
> > >> seem
> > >>
> > >>>> to like it.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> /ken
> > >>>>
> > >>>> # yum update
> > >>>> Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
> > >>>> Setting up Update Process
> > >>>> Resolving Dependencies
> > >>>> --> Running transaction check
> > >>>> ---> Package sbcl.i386 0:1.0.22-1.fc9 set to be updated
> > >>>> --> Processing Dependency: sbcl = 1.0.17 for package: slime-sbcl
> > >>>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> > >>>> slime-sbcl-2.0-12.fc9.ccrma.i386 from installed has depsolving
> > >>>>
> > >> problems
> > >>
> > >>>>   --> Missing Dependency: sbcl = 1.0.17 is needed by package
> > >>>> slime-sbcl-2.0-12.fc9.ccrma.i386 (installed)
> > >>>> Error: Missing Dependency: sbcl = 1.0.17 is needed by package
> > >>>> slime-sbcl-2.0-12.fc9.ccrma.i386 (installed)
> > >>>>
> > >>> Yes, I'm working on it, thanks for the report!
> > >>>
> > >> Should be fixed now (new build of slime + clm + cm + cmn on i386)
> > >> -- Fernando
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> > >> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
> > >> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> > >> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
> > >> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
> > >>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> > > PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
> > > http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
> > >
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> > PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
> > http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma