[PlanetCCRMA] New conflict with f9 update (and f8 too)

[David Ford]

Hi Fernando

Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 10:31 +0000, Simon W. Fielding wrote:
>   
>> Fernando,
>>
>> What David says below is precisely what mine says also. Sorry for the
>> delay in replying.
>>     
>
> AFAICT sbcl 1.0.17 is the latest and the cm/clm/cmn packages from Planet
>   
I already have both of these:
rpm -q sbcl gives --- sbcl-1.0.17-3.fc8
rpm -q slime-sbcl gives --- slime-sbcl-2.0.12.fc8.ccrma
> CCRMA already match that. What is happening is that you are still
> pointing to some old repository and that may is probably Planet CCRMA
> mirror, ahem. Sorry. You should disable the Planet CCRMA url for updates
> (for now) and let the normal Fedora mirrors take care of updates. You
> will see that you will _switch_ repositories to one with i386.newkey/
> url and that's the one that will have the newer sbcl, etc packages (the
> update will be a two stage process, first switch repositories and then
> do the upgrade with the new one). 
>   
Did all that then ran 'yum update'
The error is :
'Package sbcl.i386 0:1.0.22-1.fc8 set to be updated' . . . etc.
It looks like there is an update to sbcl but the slime-sbcl we have 
still requires sbcl-1.0.17
I guess it's just a case of waiting 'til things synchronise.

Sorry - I should have run yum from the command line - as you asked - to 
start with.
> -- Fernando
>   
David
>
>   
>>> Hi Fernando
>>> PUP says "Error resolving dependencies"
>>> "Details
>>> Missing dependency: sbcl = 1.0.17 is needed by package
>>> slime-sbcl-2-0.12fc8.ccrma.i386 (installed)"
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>>>       
>>>> On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 12:49 +0000, Simon W. Fielding wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Would it be possible to do the same for FC8? I would be very
>>>>>           
>>> grateful if
>>>       
>>>>> so.
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Hmmm, I was not aware of a new sbcl for fc8? What is exactly yum
>>>>         
>>> prints
>>>       
>>>> when you try an upgrade?
>>>>
>>>> -- Fernando
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Simon Fielding
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: planetccrma-bounces at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
>>>>> [mailto:planetccrma-bounces at ccrma.Stanford.EDU] On Behalf Of
>>>>>           
>>> Fernando
>>>       
>>>>> Lopez-Lezcano
>>>>> Sent: 27 November 2008 00:07
>>>>> To: dawsonwu at rahul.net
>>>>> Cc: planetccrma at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PlanetCCRMA] New conflict with f9 update
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 14:52 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 14:32 -0800, Ken Dawson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fedora 9 just posted an update to sbcl.i386, and slime-sbcl
>>>>>>>               
>>> doesn't
>>>       
>>>>> seem
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> to like it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /ken
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> # yum update
>>>>>>> Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
>>>>>>> Setting up Update Process
>>>>>>> Resolving Dependencies
>>>>>>> --> Running transaction check
>>>>>>> ---> Package sbcl.i386 0:1.0.22-1.fc9 set to be updated
>>>>>>> --> Processing Dependency: sbcl = 1.0.17 for package: slime-sbcl
>>>>>>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>>>>>>> slime-sbcl-2.0-12.fc9.ccrma.i386 from installed has depsolving
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>> problems
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>>>   --> Missing Dependency: sbcl = 1.0.17 is needed by package
>>>>>>> slime-sbcl-2.0-12.fc9.ccrma.i386 (installed)
>>>>>>> Error: Missing Dependency: sbcl = 1.0.17 is needed by package
>>>>>>> slime-sbcl-2.0-12.fc9.ccrma.i386 (installed)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> Yes, I'm working on it, thanks for the report!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Should be fixed now (new build of slime + clm + cm + cmn on i386)
>>>>> -- Fernando
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>>>>> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
>>>>> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>>>>> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
>>>>> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>>>> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
>>>> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>>> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
>>> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
>> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>>     
>
>