[PlanetCCRMA] New conflict with f9 update (and f8 too)

[Fernando Lopez-Lezcano]

On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 11:50 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 19:35 +0000, David Ford wrote:
> > Hi Fernando
> > 
> > Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 10:31 +0000, Simon W. Fielding wrote:
> > >   
> > >> Fernando,
> > >>
> > >> What David says below is precisely what mine says also. Sorry for the
> > >> delay in replying.
> > >>     
> > >
> > > AFAICT sbcl 1.0.17 is the latest and the cm/clm/cmn packages from Planet
> > >   
> > I already have both of these:
> > rpm -q sbcl gives --- sbcl-1.0.17-3.fc8
> > rpm -q slime-sbcl gives --- slime-sbcl-2.0.12.fc8.ccrma
> > > CCRMA already match that. What is happening is that you are still
> > > pointing to some old repository and that may is probably Planet CCRMA
> > > mirror, ahem. Sorry. You should disable the Planet CCRMA url for updates
> > > (for now) and let the normal Fedora mirrors take care of updates. You
> > > will see that you will _switch_ repositories to one with i386.newkey/
> > > url and that's the one that will have the newer sbcl, etc packages (the
> > > update will be a two stage process, first switch repositories and then
> > > do the upgrade with the new one). 
> > >   
> > Did all that then ran 'yum update'
> > The error is :
> > 'Package sbcl.i386 0:1.0.22-1.fc8 set to be updated' . . . etc.
> 
> Ah, ok, so there's an even newer sbcl for fc8... I'm trying to get it
> right now, will rebuild for it what I get it. 

It should be working now again (the sbcl world on fc8). 
Thanks for the report and followup...

-- Fernando