[PlanetCCRMA] New conflict with f9 update (and f8 too)

[Fernando Lopez-Lezcano]

On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 19:35 +0000, David Ford wrote:
> Hi Fernando
> 
> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 10:31 +0000, Simon W. Fielding wrote:
> >   
> >> Fernando,
> >>
> >> What David says below is precisely what mine says also. Sorry for the
> >> delay in replying.
> >>     
> >
> > AFAICT sbcl 1.0.17 is the latest and the cm/clm/cmn packages from Planet
> >   
> I already have both of these:
> rpm -q sbcl gives --- sbcl-1.0.17-3.fc8
> rpm -q slime-sbcl gives --- slime-sbcl-2.0.12.fc8.ccrma
> > CCRMA already match that. What is happening is that you are still
> > pointing to some old repository and that may is probably Planet CCRMA
> > mirror, ahem. Sorry. You should disable the Planet CCRMA url for updates
> > (for now) and let the normal Fedora mirrors take care of updates. You
> > will see that you will _switch_ repositories to one with i386.newkey/
> > url and that's the one that will have the newer sbcl, etc packages (the
> > update will be a two stage process, first switch repositories and then
> > do the upgrade with the new one). 
> >   
> Did all that then ran 'yum update'
> The error is :
> 'Package sbcl.i386 0:1.0.22-1.fc8 set to be updated' . . . etc.

Ah, ok, so there's an even newer sbcl for fc8... I'm trying to get it
right now, will rebuild for it what I get it. 

-- Fernando


> It looks like there is an update to sbcl but the slime-sbcl we have 
> still requires sbcl-1.0.17
> I guess it's just a case of waiting 'til things synchronise.
> 
> Sorry - I should have run yum from the command line - as you asked - to 
> start with.
> > -- Fernando
> >   
> David
> >
> >   
> >>> Hi Fernando
> >>> PUP says "Error resolving dependencies"
> >>> "Details
> >>> Missing dependency: sbcl = 1.0.17 is needed by package
> >>> slime-sbcl-2-0.12fc8.ccrma.i386 (installed)"
> >>>
> >>> David
> >>>
> >>> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> >>>       
> >>>> On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 12:49 +0000, Simon W. Fielding wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>         
> >>>>> Would it be possible to do the same for FC8? I would be very
> >>>>>           
> >>> grateful if
> >>>       
> >>>>> so.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>           
> >>>> Hmmm, I was not aware of a new sbcl for fc8? What is exactly yum
> >>>>         
> >>> prints
> >>>       
> >>>> when you try an upgrade?
> >>>>
> >>>> -- Fernando