[PlanetCCRMA] new realtime kernels for f7/8 (2.6.24.3-1.rt1.2)

[Hector Centeno]

Hi,

I just upgraded the CCRMA kernel in my laptop and found that direct
rendering is broken (so compiz doesn't work) with Intel video chips.
There is a bug report here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433728

According to the commentaries it has been fixed in a newer version
(kernel-2.6.24.3-34.fc8) already "submitted as an update", but I guess
that doesn't mean it's available for download since yum is not
reporting any new kernel, also I guess the CCRMA kernel would have to
be rebuilt  to recover direct rendering :-(

Cheers,

Hector



On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Henrik Frisk <frisk.h@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Henrik Frisk <frisk.h@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
> >  <nando@ccrma.stanford.edu> wrote:
> >  > Hi all...
> >  >
> >  >  A new batch of realtime kernels are now available for f7 and f8, i386
> >  >  and x86_64[*] (version 2.6.24.3-1.rt1.2). They are based on 2.6.24.3
> >  >  plus the current crop of (beta) realtime patches from the MRG redhat
> >  >  kernel (their upcoming realtime system based on RedHat Enterprise) plus
> >  >  the latest patches from the Fedora 8 testing kernel.
> >  >
> >  >  The MRG patches include most of the rt1 patch set from Ingo, plus
> >  >  additional fixes and seems, in my limited experience, to work much
> >  >  better than the previous 2.6.24 kernel. We'll see...
> >  >
> >  Thanks Fernando. Unfortunately the same errors I had with the last
> >  2.6.24 version persist in this one. However, I have the same problems
> >  with the Fedora 2.6.24 kernel that I just tested, so it's not to do
> >  with the RT patches.
> >
> >  The symptoms are: only one workspace, no window frames, no titlefram, no...
> >
> >  I haven't yet checked the Fedora list, but I would suspect I'm not the
> >  only one with these problems. The 2.6.23 kernel (Fedora and CCRMA)
> >  works fine on my system which is a Dell 640M laptop.
> >
>
> OK, after some reading on the Fedora list and the Fedora-dev list I
> understand many users have problems with the 2.6.24 kernel. Some of
> the developers think it shouldn't have been released:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-March/msg00419.html
>
> Anyway, if it works for you, it according to some "fixes more than it
> breaks", if it doesn't work for you, you're better off sticking with
> the 2.6.23. Please note, this is not my opinion, it's a summary of
> what I've read on the other lists...
>
> Thanks for all the great work with PlanetCCRMA!
>
> best,
>
> Henrik
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>