[PlanetCCRMA] new packages in Fedora updates-testing (2010-03-13)
nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Sun Mar 14 14:55:10 PDT 2010
On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 05:15 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 21:42 -0800, Niels Mayer wrote:
> >> Seems like the issue w/ this jconvolver is that it's looking for a
> >> missing library link file
> >> gnulem-121-~/Download> ldd /usr/bin/jconvolver
> >> libzita-convolver.so.2 => not found
> > argh, sorry. Yes, Orcan's version is creating the proper so.x links and
> > mine is just installing as is from the tarball without tweaks.
> > Regretfully my version is overriding Fedora's and thus the problem. The
> > beauties of separate repositories...
> > Hmmm. Orcan, I should probably fix this on my side by recreating the
> > Planet CCRMA package from the Fedora .src.rpm (with a higher e-v-r) and
> > fixing anything that breaks on my side (if anything). Then on the next
> > upgrade from Fedora things will get back to normal. Opinions?
> Yeah, that sounds like a good plan.
Ok, done. I have released 2.0.0-1.1.fc12.ccrma for Fedora 12. The only
problem that could happen is the release of a 2.0.0-1 in Fedora 13
(instead, a -2 release number would be best). Anyway, I can always fix
that on my end as well and things will go back to normal on the next
release of zita-convolver.
Hmmm, maybe I should always release all my packages with a 0.x release
number so that they are always overriden by Fedora (a trick used many
many years ago by Extras when it was not even part of Fedora).
More information about the PlanetCCRMA