[PlanetCCRMA] ardour timing out ) ;

mike@banta.psyc.missouri.edu mike@banta.psyc.missouri.edu
Wed Oct 20 21:27:01 2004


<blush>I'm using my stock i810 motherboard card (just dumped a wad on a 
new taylor git.).  If someone told me I could spend $300 on a 4-channel 
breakout box/card that would fix my booting problems, I'd get it instead 
of food!

Thanks, I may try fc2
Mike

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Mark Knecht wrote:

> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 23:02:03 -0500 (CDT), mike@banta.psyc.missouri.edu
> <mike@banta.psyc.missouri.edu> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I've never been able to boot the low lat. kernel on my machine, and
> > manually patching a stock kernel fails too.  I've managed to have a decent
> > system (very high latency), but now ardour keeps crashing during
> > mixing..saying that jack shut down because ardour was too slow (jack keep
> > running of course). My xruns are usually very high, but the following is
> > after 5(18).
> > 
> > Jack gives the following:
> > alsa_pcm: xrun of at least 32.876 msecs
> > late driver wakeup: nframes to process = 2048.
> > late driver wakeup: nframes to process = 2048.
> > late driver wakeup: nframes to process = 3072.
> > subgraph starting at ardour timed out (subgraph_wait_fd=20, status = 0,
> > state = Running)
> > client failure: client ardour state = Running errors = 1
> > 
> > I'm running rh9 with blackbox on a 2.8ghz celeron, with the newest jack
> > and ardour (by ccrma apt).  Any advise on how I can remedy this, or should
> > I work really hard to get a (FC1, FC2, ?) low lat. kernel to boot?
> > 
> > Thanks for any advise, I hope one day my creativity can catch up to the
> > awsome power you've given my machine,
> > Mike
> > 
> 
> Mike,
>    If you're up for trying it, I have managed to get what appears ot
> be a very nice kernel built on top of FC2. I think that the newest
> kernels, 2.6.9 based, are going to work out pretty well when they
> stabilize. If you haven't been able to boot a 2.4 Planet kernel on
> this machine then it would seem that maybe going to FC2 would be a
> better choice?
> 
>    What sourd of sound card are you working with.
> 
> - Mark
> 

--